3 hours
There are ways to do this on some devices. Here’s an article about it, Google translate’d to English:
- 0 posts
- 8 comments
Joined 2 months ago
Cake day: May 30th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- 23 hours
Is this Anubis?
These are literally the first passages from Wikipedia.
What country doesn’t have domestic weapons manufacturing? Is it a problem when US or France do it?
Paywalled, doesn’t even allow to view a word but the title.
The Örebro Party (Swedish: Örebropartiet, ÖP or ÖrP) is a political party in Sweden. The party was initially only a local party in Örebro, Sweden. Markus Allard is the party leader. According to Allard the party cannot be placed anywhere on the traditional left-right spectrum. The party has been variously characterised as left-wing and right-wing, as well as populist, nationalist and conservative.
Some key issues for the Örebro Party locally include strong secularism, a 30-hour workweek with retained pay, lowered wages for politicians, expanded social housing, abolishing preschool-fees, making public transport free of charge,[3] ending taxpayer funding of what it sees as wasteful sculptures, monuments and art and introducing free dental care.[4][5] Nationally the party has set out large-scale remigration, closing the Swedish borders to immigration, a stricter assimilation policy and ending taxes on energy and fuel as some of its key issues.[6][7]
Don’t see anything particularly racist. And since when domestic weapons manufacture is the problem?
Banning some technology just because it “harms the reputation” of a platform sounds a lot like Visa and PayPal attacks on Steam and Itch Io to ban NSFW games.
Crypto technology is diverse. Nano and NanUSD are completely carbon-neurtal as they have zero fees. Gridcoin helps scientific research.
Crypto may be tainted in the US where banking systems are okay, but for individuals in third-world sanctioned countries like Iran it is a life saver. For people in authoritarian countries, it is the only way to fund journalism and civil rights organisations that are illegal in their countries.
The original proposal contained a ban on all blockchain technology, and another code hosting service did that. It is a technology that is used by some governments to democratise digital elections. Fraud in 2022 Moscow council elections was uncovered because they relied on a blockchain technology.
If copyright status is the reason, they should ban any, even a single-line AI contributions.
And it seems a short-sighted decision. Now AI is slop, but what about in 10? 20 years? They would rewrite TOS again?
And what about people they want to migrate from GitHub?
Self-ping test
@nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf