I made three claims and you talked about a single one, and not in a substantive way.
This conversation doesn’t seem to be going anywhere interesting or useful, so goodbye.
I made three claims and you talked about a single one, and not in a substantive way.
This conversation doesn’t seem to be going anywhere interesting or useful, so goodbye.
Hmm, maybe the bits of my post that you didn’t quote contain the answer.
First though you need to understand I’m mainly saying I don’t buy their justification.
5 Zimbabwean dollars.
You’re right I wasn’t really thinking about the possibility of verbatim reproduction. I guess we’ll see about that.
Codeberg will need efficient procedures to handle IP trolls anyway, getting a bunch more takedown requests ought not to make a big difference. And if somehow it does start to be a problem… that would be the time to blanket ban or take similar drastic action. If it’s possible to detect now, it will be possible to detect then.
Politics will absolutely care about having a precedent which leaves big tech exposed. Any case against little fish will be jumped on by Zuck and Bezos before you can say “datacenter”.
Oh right that makes sense yikes
How did an infection from a small wound lead to an infection serious enough to require amputation? Maybe I’m being naive but I can only imagine you have to ignore it quite badly for that to happen…
There is simply no way that is true. First, the legal arguments are dodgy:
Second, there is no fucking way a western court is going to tell every big tech company they have to delete 99% of the code that was written since the start of the year, even if the law as written literally said verbatim, “use of any LLM output for any purpose is breach of copyright” because it doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to realise that it’s politically impossible.
You may not like that, but it means that, again, Codeberg is doing this based on feels.
k