- 17 hours
wait, I KNOW YOU, i’ve seen you before!!! haiiiii :3
also, how tf did you take a picture of me?
- 14 hours
haiii :3
i’ll never tell where i got the picture! >:3
(i can’t remember)
I will not be tempted to distro hop. I’m perfectly content on my flavor of Arch. (˶˃⤙˂˶)
- 21 hours
It’s possible to modify your current setup, might just take a little time and effort.
- pleb_maximus@piefed.zipEnglish2 days
Shit. On one hand, I don’t feel like distro hopping, on the other hand it looks just perfect…
- 21 hours
Tbf, you can totally modify your setup to look like anything. That’s the beauty of Arch: cutting-edge and minimal.
- pleb_maximus@piefed.zipEnglish11 hours
Basically I can. But if I do it on my own, it looks like a stitched together Frankensteinian monster.
I tried arch as a daily driver many many years ago, it was a great learning experience, but maintaining that system wasn’t worth it.
I use it in distrobox daily though. Rolling distros work really nicely for doing dev work through distrobox on an otherwise immutable system
- 2 days
This is because the average arch user does not enjoy their experience. The average enjoyer is so far beyond a mere “user” when it comes to self-flaggelation
For me, Arch “just works”™. Rarely when I stumble into an arch-related issue, a quick five minute search is all I need if I don’t already know the fix for the issue.
- esc@piefed.socialEnglish2 days
Actually most people that stick with arch enjoy it very much. At least among people I know.
- 21 hours
I played around with Mint, Fedora, Debian (Raspbian, really) and Zorin casually when I was still a Windows user. Arch was my first daily driver after switching cold turkey some three years ago, and I’ve been pretty happy with it.
- esc@piefed.socialEnglish20 hours
I did something similar in 2010 barely understanding what am I doing. Feel good about that decision to this day.










