• 6 hours

    They’ll also kidnap you and deliver you to the police who may or may not murder you depending on their mood.

    https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-07-07/waymo-reports-teen-riders-for-bad-behavior-delivers-them-to-police

    What if you look underage but aren’t? What if you take medication but waymo thinks you’re doing drugs? There are thousands of scenarios that can be misinterpreted, kidnapping the rider and delivering them to a murder squad is not the solution.

  • 8 hours

    How many accidents do they cause?

    How often do they interfere with traffic our the standard operation of transport by just sitting there.

  • 11 hours

    Severe doubt. Getting to decide what a “minor” accident is and exclude it…yeah, uh huh

  • 8 hours

    Waymos on YouTube getting stuck in places cars shouldn’t be is about as good an example that exists that these should all be ADAS features in cars with the human incharge, and that AI should also be used as a tool and not to replace humans.

    The comparison isn’t fair if the human driver doesn’t have similar ADAS features. But nice try Waymo.

  • 11 hours

    Without knowing the methodology the IIHS used to arrive at its claim, I’ll remain unconvinced.

  • the analysis excluded minor incidents involving Waymos that would likely not have been reported to the police had a human been driving,”

    I feel like this is a pretty glaring flaw in the study… They got to redefine what they consider to be a collision and ended up negating nearly 80% of the reports. Something tells me they didn’t comb through the data from human reports and do the same.

      1. That explains why they park illegally like all the time.

      2. When are we gonna see waymo motorbikes?

    • 18 hours

      That isn’t really what that article says. It says that in edge cases, remote workers (mostly in the Philippines) give additional contextual inputs to the autopilot. There are some outstanding issues with waymos, especially around getting stuck idling or infinite loops at construction sites, but really just being remotely operated is not one of them.

    • No, they actually have fewer total accidents per mile than actual taxi drivers. Did you read the link you posted? They are involved in 1.5 times more accidents with severe or fatal injuries per mile, but that is comparing Waymos driving in more open cities at higher speeds to taxis in the very slow speed, high traffic city of NYC where the primary use case is different. Also, the only fatal accidents (2 of them) have been the fault of other cars, not Waymos, so it’s kinda unfair to include those.

      • 22 hours

        “The researchers compared Waymo’s nationwide crash data with New York City’s for-hire fleet and found the robotaxis had a serious injury or fatal crash rate about 1.5 times higher per mile driven.”

        • Yes, thank you for quoting exactly what I said??

          You are quoting the serious or fatal injury stats. The overall injury accident rate, though, as quoted from the article: “When all injury-causing crashes were considered, Waymo performed better. Its robotaxis were involved in 67% fewer injury crashes per million miles than New York City’s for-hire vehicles.”

          • Wow you’re trying really hard to shill for these AI cars. Imagine downplaying a 50% increase in death rate

            Funny how you ignored this part too:

            the analysis excluded minor incidents involving Waymos that would likely not have been reported to the police had a human been driving,”

          • Fatalities and serious injuries sound like a far more important statistic to optimize for in terms of public safety.

            • 17 hours

              They would need to have more of them first for the data to actually be accurate at all. From what I could find, there have been no Waymo caused fatalities - two deaths caused by other drivers though - and four serious injuries, for roughly 220 million miles driven.

              While you can then state that the rate of fatalities is 1 per 110 million miles, it’s not really useful in any way.

  • hot take but i’m actually excited for these to come to seattle

    can’t get sexually harassed by a car with no driver. this is a recurring problem when i take ubers

        • Yes, but you didn’t say “make mistakes”. You said AI makes way more mistakes than regular people. And that’s simply not true:

          • Sure lol. It’s not true when you use cherry picked stats, for cars that only drive in areas literally curated for them.

    • Seriously? People as a group suck at driving. The bar is super low. You are just going to form a random opinion on this and ignore data?

    • 21 hours

      I dunno, regular people can barely handle walking sometimes. Driving is especially hard.

    • not hard to believe at all

      waymos do silly things, but people do dangerous things more often like using their phones, get distracted, driving angry/tired, road rages at rush hour, speeding, etc