- tacosanonymous@mander.xyzEnglish21 minutes
That’s really bad. I feel like some of those cars with only three wheels set a pretty high bar.
- deddit@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
It took 68 years but someone finally beat out edsle as the worst automotive failure, I’m just glad it was Elon Muppet.
- 35 minutes
reads the wikipedia article
considered overhyped, low quality, and unattractive
double checks to make sure I’m not on the cybertruck article
ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.worldEnglish
4 hoursCouldn’t happen to an uglier, more stupid car.
It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.
NekoKoneko@lemmy.worldEnglish
3 hoursI would usually give a lot of credit to someone trying something different, but I’d drive a 1971 Ford Pinto before I ever intentionally get within photographable proximity to a Cybertruck.
- cadekat@pawb.socialEnglish3 hours
When the cybertruck was first announced, I actually appreciated how different it looked, but its performance and association to Musk has entirely ruined any hope of me ever liking a low-poly vehicle ever again.
- 2 hours
I saw a concept car and expected to see a radically different version on the road. As a design study, I thought it had potential.
- MagicShel@lemmy.zipEnglish3 hours
I thought it would look unique in a geeky way. Instead it looks unique in a Nazi way. That’s not my vibe. Killed my enthusiasm for owning something that I knew most people would hate. Also costing twice as much and being a piece of shit.
- FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Indeed.
Still shocking he never hired a designer. Even an idiot fraud like Elizabeth Holmes knew to do that.
- betanumerus@lemmy.caEnglish3 hours
That’s quite exactly what they were going for actually. Lo-res graphic to represent hi-tech. Somewhat like military camo is now pixelated for no practical reason.
darkdemize@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
3 hoursJust because you don’t know why digital camouflage exists doesn’t mean it has no practical purpose.
- Klear@piefed.worldEnglish3 hours
Neither pixellation nor digitization contributes to the camouflaging effect. The pixellated style, however, simplifies design and eases printing on fabric, compared to traditional patterns. While digital patterns are becoming widespread, critics maintain that the pixellated look is a question of fashion rather than function.
- bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.
It looks like my drawing of a car as a 4 year old brought to reality
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
3 hoursReally? I see chuds driving them all over my town unfortunately. Admittedly far less popular than other Tesla vehicles though which are absolutely everywhere here in CA. Seems like most people forgot Musk is a nazi already.
- TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
I see them every so often in Seattle. I always give them a disapproving look and a big thumbs down, I’ve found that pisses people off more than a middle finger.
- cranakis@reddthat.comEnglish2 hours
I point and laugh when I see one and say “look at the fucking idiot.” They love that.
- batdad90@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
Those chuds bought early into the idea they would be renting out their trucks at night using self driving and make a profit.
- saltnotsugar@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Who would have thought a three year olds drawing of a car would have not resonated with the masses.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
3 hoursYeah the electric pickup is such a no brainer for the US market and it was one of the first.
But what if it was horribly ugly and made everyone hate you? Surely it will sell even better then!
- grue@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
Yeah the electric pickup is such a no brainer for the US
Disagree. The truck market itself is a no brainer, but electric trucks have design challenges that electric sedans don’t. Namely, aerodynamics, towing, and aerodynamics while towing. It is much harder to make an electric truck capable of doing “truck stuff” with a reasonable range and price compared to making an electric car.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
2 hoursHarder maybe but it’s clearly doable. We have a number of options now. And it’s not like they’ve had to make them hyper-aerodynamic or anything. Just took a little more advanced battery tech.
- Bonesince1997@lemmy.worldEnglish38 minutes
I believe Ford has the f150 lightning, an ev version. I don’t know how it’s been doing though.
- thallamabond@lemmy.worldEnglish8 minutes
The all electric version has been cancelled in favor of a hybrid design, but they claim the hybrid has a 700 mile range
https://www.npr.org/2025/12/15/nx-s1-5645147/ford-discontinues-all-electric-f-150-lightning
Diplomjodler@lemmy.worldEnglish
2 hoursThe design was meant to be controversial and it certainly got a lot of attention when it was first introduced. The reason that thing failed is that its performance was way worse than what was promised while costing a lot more.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
2 hoursFrom what I understand, it was never supposed to be a truck, it was supposed to be a tax write-off for businesses. That’s also why it’s stupid ugly and heavy, it has to be 500 or 600 lbs (I forget which) to get the write-off as a truck. The fact that everyone laughs when they see them was unexpected. I think they thought it would be loved by all, especially the businesses.
A new piece from Bloomberg makes the case, comparing the Tesla vehicle to the misfortunes of Ford’s Edsel, which was first introduced in 1957 and discontinued just two years later. After spending years building up hype for the car, Ford predicted selling 200,000 units in its first year, but ended up selling less than a third of that.
That’s comparable to expectations versus reality of the Cybertruck. In fact, the Cybertruck is actually doing worse in key ways. Tesla’s annual sales target was 250,000 units, but it didn’t even crack 40,000 sales in its first year. And like the Edsel, it’s sold less with each successive year, with barely 7,100 registered in the US in 2026 so far, according to S&P Global Mobility data — despite Musk juicing those figures by selling Cybertrucks to his own companies.
- smellhound@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
I think you forgot a zero, right?
-
Rear-Wheel Drive (Single Motor): 6,118 lbs (2,775 kg)
-
All-Wheel Drive (Dual Motor): 6,634 to 6,669 lbs (3,009 to 3,025 kg)
-
Cyberbeast (Tri-Motor): 6,863 to 6,898 lbs (3,113 to 3,129 kg)
-
- frongt@lemmy.zipEnglish1 hour
6,000, not 600. 600 would be a very light vehicle indeed. Even the Reliant Robin is about 970. The Smart Fortwo is at least 1,800.
Or it has to have certain offroading features.
https://www.autoblog.com/features/everything-is-an-suv-today-because-of-this-fuel-economy-loophole
- Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish3 hours
Cybertruck Is the Biggest Flop
Why does anyone think that is still news?












